Thursday, October 6, 2011

Book Review: 'The Sun Over Breda' by Arturo Perez-Reverte

The Sun Over Breda: The Adventures of Captain Alatriste (1998)
Arturo Pérez-Reverte (1951-)










273 pages

In the fog, rain and mud of Flanders, far from their homes in Spain, soldiers of King Philip IV fight to retain control of the land for their country and for the “true religion,” against “heretical” and “Calvinist” rebels. The Spanish soldiers, often going without pay for many months at a time, fight on wearing disintegrating clothing and eating scraps of food, taking what they can from the occasional sacking of a larger city, or from what little the Dutch of the countryside still have left after many years of war. But then, as Arturo Pérez-Reverte makes clear throughout his novel The Sun Over Breda, these Spanish soldiers fight not so much for riches as for honor --- their own and their country’s.

The novel is one of a series written by Pérez-Reverte chronicling the adventures of the fictional Captain Diego Alatriste. Alatriste fights in the Spanish army during the tumultuous years of the early 17th century, as Spain, after over a century as the strongest, wealthiest and most influential country on earth, was beginning to slowly lose its grip on power. Though still strong, its army suffered the effects of too many widely dispersed commitments; though still wealthy, the country watched its riches disappear at an alarming rate to support those commitments; and though still wielding significant influence, it saw England and France begin to gain the upper hand in conflicts throughout Europe and the New World.

Captain Alatriste’s young, teenage aide Iñigo Balboa narrates the story, presenting it to the reader from some future point, as he looks back and tries to explain the events leading up to the surrender of the Flemish city of Breda to the Spanish in 1624 after a long siege, and the lives of the soldiers with whom he had shared the experience. Captain Alatriste, ever at the center of the Iñigo’s recounting, stands as an icon of the brave soldiers who fought for their homeland, and yet in many ways were homeless and on their own. A skillful fighter whose heroic engagement for the Spanish on far-flung battlefields carries much weight with his squad, Alatriste’s title of ‘Captain’ is actually honorary, not official, bestowed upon him by the men of his squad and even acknowledged by his immediate superiors. Thoughtful and taciturn, Alatriste is hard but fair, the epitome of the honor-bound soldier who follows orders without complaint, but understands too when he must stand with him men and his principles against an injustice.

The novel opens with the bloody sacking by the Spanish of a smaller city near Breda, and continues through a sequence of clashes up to the end of the siege of Breda itself. Pérez-Reverte, however, does not simply present to the reader an action-adventure story of hard-fought battles. Though plenty of swordplay and fighting occurs along the way, The Sun Over Breda stands out as true historical fiction, as the author goes into detail about the difficult conditions in which the soldiers (as well as the Dutch of the war-torn countryside) live, how the years of war have worn them down, and how and why they continue to carry on in the face of nearly unending hardship. Not just a novel of soldiers fighting bravely for their cause, Pérez-Reverte allows us to feel the cold, wet, stitched-together clothing the soldiers continuously patch together, the taste of the dried out bread and then soup they survive on as they wait to fight, and the chaos of hand to hand combat along foggy dikes and in dark caves barely wide enough to pass through.


Other reviews / information:
To my mind, Viggo Mortensen plays an excellent Captain Alatriste in a film version of the series, Alatriste.


Other of my book reviews: FICTION and NON-FICTION

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Book Review: 'The Witch of Hebron' by James Howard Kunstler

The Witch of Hebron: A World Made By Hand Novel (2010)
James Howard Kunstler (1948-)










334 pages

In this sequel to his novel World Made By Hand, James Howard Kunstler continues his vision of a post-apocalyptic America, as seen through the lives of the residents of the small, fictional town of Union Grove in upstate New York. The novel opens in mid-October, just a month or so after the events in the first concluded. (My review of World Made By Hand outlines the causes of the downfall, and its effects on America in general and Union Grove in particular, so I won’t repeat that here.)

An unfortunate accident in the first few pages of the story leads to a willful act by the son of the town’s doctor that drives the rest of the novel’s plot, and carries the action out of Union Grove and into the surrounding countryside as well as nearby hamlets and towns. The tenuous relationship between the original citizens of Union Grove and their new neighbors of the New Faith order continues its fitful development as events lead the two sides to work together, though at times with ulterior motives. The supernatural events that arise near the end of the first novel (somewhat surprisingly, as discussed in the earlier review) are expanded on in this one, as is intimated by the title.

Unlike the startling freshness of the first book, however, in which the dramatic effects of the all too realistic slide of American economy and society into a state of chaos maintain a firm grip on the reader’s attention, this sequel is a coming of age story in a by now familiar environment. Though the action does lead to glimpses of what life has come to in other nearby communities, this serves mostly as a reminder of how fortunate the citizens of Union Grove have it.

And, the story seems mostly focused on character development in preparation for future stories in the series. For example, very near the end of the novel, when the drama of the story has resolved itself, one of the main characters meets another, and “the man he had known pretty well for more than a decade took on a fiendish glow in the flickering candlelight” --- the foreshadowing here is about as subtle as a hammer.

The result is that, although an entertaining read, the story moves somewhat slowly towards its conclusion.


Other reviews / information:
A strong negative review at Casaubon's Book.

A more positive review by Lance Foster in the NY Journal of Books.

Other of my book reviews: FICTION and NON-FICTION

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Book Review: 'World Made By Hand' by James Howard Kunstler

World Made by Hand (2008)
James Howard Kunstler (1948-)










317 pages

Terrorists have exploded nuclear bombs in Washington DC and Los Angeles, severely disrupting both the government and transportation of goods, and quickly leaving the US economy in taters as confusion and security concerns paralyze the country in fear. A war in the Middle East shuts off a significant amount of the oil supply, destroying what is left of both the US and world economies. Appliances and other electronic equipment sit gathering dust as the electricity has sputtered out, cars and trucks that have not been melted down for metal gather rust in the weeds for lack of gasoline and communication even between neighboring communities has become rare in James Howard Kunstler’s vision of the near future.

All this has occurred several years in the past as World Made by Hand opens. The novel follows the lives of the citizens of a small town in upstate New York, as they come to grips with the new world in which they live. They hear of the violence that has swept through the bigger cities and more populated areas, though their relative isolation from the rest of the country saves them from much of its worst effects; they have less luck when the flu and other diseases spread quickly through the population leaving many dead, as medication now in short supply or out completely.

The residents who have survived find themselves returning to the lifestyles of their ancestors. They learn how to make use of what grows naturally or can be raised in and around their community; how to make the clothing and furniture they used to buy and the now vacant and crumbling stores on the outskirts of town; and how to entertain themselves in a world without the electrical distractions of the past. In Kunstler’s telling, many of the people of this small community, once the turmoil of the transition has been overcome, gradually embrace the new, slower world they have inherited. They may occasionally long for particular aspects of their past, eating a favorite food from a far-away place or throwing clothes in a washing machine, but in general they find that the peace and serenity of their new lives more than makes up for the additional hard work of the highly localized and completely de-electrified new world.

But their isolation is not complete of course, as the townspeople discover when a religious group called the New Faith arrives from Virginia seeking a quieter and safer corner of the country. Taking advantage of the lack of any functioning government in the community, the group buys some buildings and land, and settles in. Although the new settlers bring additional talents and capabilities into the town, their tendency to remain separate from the community, their religious fervor and their distinct manners and habits lead to an on-going, low level tension between the them and the original townspeople.

The New Faith order as a kind of foil for the townspeople. While the New Faith members are tightly organized in their work and their goals, the townspeople have settled into a kind of apolitical and secular stagnation --- they help one another for the common good, but they remain focused primarily on their own lives, no one taking the initiative to create order or structure in the town as a whole. The arrival of the New Faith group forges a sense among the townspeople that they need to pull together to at least meet this new ‘other’ from a stronger position, and thus new leaders to begin this work.

Kunstler builds the plot slowly, introducing the townspeople and their changed world, and then slowly adding in elements that serve both to build tension for the reader, and to shake the characters out of their settled existence. From the sequence of disasters that pre-date the events of the story, to the description of the new life the people build for themselves and the challenges they face, the author keeps the novel grounded in a realism that actually adds an unsettling quality for the reader, as it becomes easy to imagine oneself in the new world he has created. The one false note for me then, comes very near the end, when the author introduces a bit of the supernatural into the story; it seems to come out of nowhere, and feels out of place. (Having now later read Kunstler’s follow-up novel, The Witch of Hebron: A World Made by Hand Novel, it becomes clear that the introduction of the supernatural in World Made by Hand serves as a set-up for a storyline that will apparently be followed in a series of sequels to this opening novel.)

In World Made by Hand James Howard Kunstler presents a startling vision of an all too easy to imagine future. Unlike other apocalyptic stories, the apocalypse here comes from events that could be ripped from today’s headlines --- no world-wide nuclear war, or asteroid slamming into the Earth, just a relatively isolated series of events that jam the gears of our extremely complex modern society.


Other reviews / information:

Other of my book reviews: FICTION and NON-FICTION

Monday, September 5, 2011

Book Review: 'A Philosophical Investigation' by Philip Kerr

A Philosophical Investigation (1992)
Philip Kerr (1956-)










 330 pages


Written in 1992, A Philosophical Investigation is a detective novel set mainly in London of the near future. Philip Kerr imagines a world in 2013 in which the financial separation between the poor and the rich has continued to increase even as the two groups live more tightly packed into the city. Parts of London built in hopes of rejuvenating its downtown have deteriorated into areas dangerous even for the police to enter, and deteriorating economic and cultural conditions have led to a rapid increase in crime --- in particular an epidemic of serial killers. Governments have turned to ever more drastic measures to provide security, with budgetary pressures both constraining and guiding the approaches taken. A possible future not difficult for a reader to identify with.

In the world of the novel, scientists in the recent past have discovered a part of the brain (the ‘ventral medial nucleus’, or VPN) which when removed reduces the self-control of aggression in males. Further research has shown that some people are born without this critical, regulating part of the brain, and that men born without it are more likely to become criminals. And, through a not-unrealistic sequence of events, the government and eventually corporate and insurance programs have led to a large group of men in the United Kingdom being tested for its presence, with promises that the results are anonymous.

The novel turns on the crimes of a killer who has managed to compromise the anonymity of the program, and is killing off those men who have been found to be VPN-negative. Assigned to the case is a tough, no-nonsense detective, Isadora ‘Jake’ Jacowicz, who works in a department of Scotland Yard responsible for investigating serial killers; in addition to her day-to-day detective work, Jake writes and presents lectures on patterns in serial killer behavior at conferences on criminal behavior.

The chapters of the novel alternate between the voices of Jake and the serial killer as they play an increasingly personal game of cat and mouse. As the case proceeds, each begins to recognize in the other a formidable adversary, for whom they develop both a fear and a grudging respect.

Philip Kerr’s placement of the novel in 2013 put it 20 years into the future when he wrote it. Reading it in 2011, with 2013 just on our doorstep, gives an interesting twist to his original setting. The general drift in his world to increasing extremes between rich and poor, and government struggles to provide security, are recognizable aspects of our present world, even if some of the details he imagines (video-phones still have not become commonplace) have not materialized.

More challenging for the reader is the ‘Philosophical’ aspect of A Philosophical Investigation; for reasons that become clear as the novel progresses, the names of famous philosophers of the past become relevant to the story, as do in some cases their theories and writings. Not having a strong background in these philosophers’ histories leaves one struggling at times to see the connections characters are drawing. One is left with the desire to go back and learn more about the philosophers mentioned, and then re-read the book to catch what might have been missed on the first reading.

Even without that background, however, the novel captures the reader’s attention in the way a good detective story should. The tension mounts rapidly as the two protagonists become more and more tightly bound together in what becomes a personal battle between them. Different from so many detective stories though, the novel does not present an easy contrast of good and evil. The reader is drawn into the conflicted complexities of Jake’s feeling about the killer, for whom she develops a kind of understanding, one that does not forgive the killings being perpetrated, but that has some sympathy for the mental struggles that have led to them.


Other reviews / information:


Other of my book reviews: FICTION and NON-FICTION

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Book Review: 'The Lords of Discipline' by Pat Conroy

The Lords of Discipline (1980)
Pat Conroy (1945-)

499 pages

Flawed characters one and all populate Pat Conroy’s novel The Lords of Discipline. He sets the story in 1967, in Charleston, South Carolina, at the fictitious Carolina Military Institute (CMI), and uses the setting to examine two small, proud, closed societies in the United States: the aristocratic families of east coast cities with historical roots going back to the nation’s founding, and the few remaining military institutes in the country. In the Author’s Note that precedes the novel he writes that he has modeled CMI on his experiences at Citadel University, in Charleston, which he attended in the 1960’s, as well as on the experiences of graduates from other military institutes, military high schools, and military academies --- though he states that the specific events in this novel are fictitious.

The story centers on cadet-student Will McLean, who has come to Charleston from Georgia to attend CMI and so fulfill, if reluctantly, a deathbed promise to his overbearing father, a former marine and CMI graduate. During his freshman year, McLean befriends and eventually becomes roommates with the son of one of Charleston’s oldest families, and finds himself seemingly taken in as part of the family. Having arrived at CMI with a half-formed but stubbornly held set of beliefs and attitudes born out of his middle class upbringing and his consistent rebellion against anything his father stood for, his life at CMI as well as his interaction with the Charleston elite force him to re-evaluate his motivations and outlook, his strengths and limitations, and make the transition to manhood.

From the moment he arrives on campus, McLean bucks against the harsh plebe system and more generally the military formality of the institute. But his rebellion is at the same time tempered by his unwillingness to be seen as a failure, either in his mother’s eyes, or those of his classmates. So he spends four years fighting the system, ever on the verge of insubordination to his higher ranking fellow students and professors, but never fully crossing the line in a way that would get him dismissed from the school. In a system where the cowering freshman who survive their plebe year often become the brutal disciplinarians of the following year’s freshman class, McLean’s attempts to take a more humane approach only mark him as an outsider to his classmates.

In the aristocratic world of Charleston’s upper class, McLean also confronts a society that he finds unacceptable by his standards, but one that at the same time he finds seductive with its highly cultured lifestyle --- an antidote to the single-mindedness he rails against at the school. In this rarified setting his humanist tendencies again undermine him, though now in a different way: he begins to lose sight of his initial understanding that he can never be a fully accepted part of the insular society to which an accident of circumstance has given him entrance.

The plot of the novel turns on the enrollment in McLean’s senior year of the first black student at CMI, Pearce. A member of the school administration asks McLean to keep an eye on Pearce, to try and prevent him from being run out of the school by an array of forces that want to keep the institute all white. But for large swaths of the story Pearce is not present and rarely if at all mentioned, as Conroy focuses on the impact on McLean of the complex emotional landscape of both the harsh military institute, and the genteel and proper, if aggressively self-centered, aristocratic Charleston society. McLean may dislike the military aspects of the institute and the uncritical approach most of the student-cadets take to the institute and their instruction, but he at the same time learns to cherish the camaraderie and selflessness that comes with it for his classmates. And, he may have an outsiders disdain of Charleston’s high society, but he at the same time appreciates the cultured and educated family he becomes a part of through his roommate. By having McLean work through his often contradictory feelings about these complexities, Conroy makes more convincing the events that conclude the book, when the focus comes squarely back to McLean’s struggle to save Pearce’s position at the school --- as well as his own.

Conroy leaves little to the imagination in his presentation of the physical and psychological brutality of the plebe system, which makes for many challenging moments for a reader; this is particularly the case for students whose weaknesses are discovered and harshly exploited to run them out of the school. However, by also demonstrating the camaraderie that is generated in part by surviving the brutality together with classmates, Conroy tries to provide readers unfamiliar with the setting a way to understand how some boys can withstand the violence inherent in the system, and use the experience to become men.


Read quotes from this book

Other reviews / information:


Other of my book reviews: FICTION and NON-FICTION

Monday, July 4, 2011

Book Review: 'Storms of My Grandchildren' by James Hansen

Storms of my Grandchildren (2009)
James Hansen (1941-)

320 pages

In writing Storms of my Grandchildren, James Hansen makes a clarion call for action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, concluding that “continued exploitation of all fossil fuels on Earth threatens not only the other millions of species on the planet but also the survival of humanity itself --- and the timetable is shorter than we thought.” (p. IX).

Hansen is a physicist with a background in both space and earth sciences. Starting in the late 60’s as a graduate student he spent a decade studying the planet Venus and its climate, before turning his focus in 1978 to Earth, curious about what impact the rapidly changing composition of our atmosphere would have on our climate. He has worked at both universities and as director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. In 1988 he testified before the Senate that “with 99 percent confidence … Earth was being affected by human-made greenhouse gases, and the planet had entered a period of long term warming.” (p. XV)

Over the past few years, Hansen has become convinced, based on an increasingly accurate understanding of Earth’s historical climate, the accelerating rate of increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere today, and the changes observed in Earth’s biosphere, that we driving the Earth to a climate tipping point even more rapidly than previously thought, a point which, once past, we will be powerless to return across, and which has the potential to make the world a dramatically more difficult place to live in as short a time as the end of this century, and even uninhabitable in the not too distant future beyond that. Seeing no urgency to action among politicians or the general public, and fearing for the future of his, “and all the world’s grandchildren” (p. 5), Hansen wrote this book, to tell, as he says in the subtitle, “The truth about the coming climate catastrophe and our last chance to save humanity.”

In a never dull, often entertaining and occasionally scary 320 pages, Hansen fills in the details around a simple chain of observations: greenhouse gases are changing the Earth’s atmosphere; historical data from over many millions of years give clear indications of the disastrous effects the increase in greenhouse gases will have on Earth’s climate; the only way to avoid the currently inevitable disaster is to phase out coal burning by 2030, starting immediately; and the only way to replace coal-based energy in the short-term, until renewable forms of energy can fill the void, is to use nuclear energy.

In between fleshing out the details of each of these observations, Hansen also describes his role in the political and scientific discussions on the topic over the past couple of decades. He makes clear throughout the book his distaste for having to become involved in the political aspects, preferring to stay focused on the scientific work. Climate change contrarians often accuse scientists who support the idea of global warming as ‘in it for the funding’, but it is clear from Hansen’s book, as well as coverage in the media over the years (e.g., Climate Expert Says NASA Tried to Silence Him, in The New York Times), that Hansen, particularly in his role as a NASA administrator, has had a more difficult time of it because of where the science has led him in his views. Describing himself as politically conservative, he displays no partisanship in his disappointment with politicians of both parties. The insights he provides into what occurs in the interactions between scientists and politicians makes for interesting reading --- though there are no shocking revelations to anyone having followed the debates in the media over the years.

What Hansen does particularly well in the book is describe the science of climate change. He begins by defining climate forcing agents, changes that can cause Earth to have an energy imbalance: a negative climate forcing agent causes the Earth to radiate into space more energy than it absorbs (= cooling), while a positive climate agent causes Earth to absorb more energy than it radiates into space (= heating). He then describes the significant, known climate forcing agents (natural and man-made, positive and negative), scientists understanding of the magnitude and uncertainty of each of them, and the mechanism by which they act on the Earth’s energy balance.

Climate forcing agents and the mechanisms by which they affect Earth’s energy balance are relatively well-understood, even if the precise magnitude of each is not known, as shown in the error bars in Figure 1. Less well-understood is climate sensitivity, which Hansen defines as the amount of global temperature change in response to a specified climate forcing agent. For example, greenhouse gases are a climate forcing agent --- an increase in their amounts causes a known amount of heating of the Earth --- but how much temperature rise will a given amount of Greenhouse gases ultimately cause?

Hansen lists two methods of estimating what the climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases and other climate forcing agents might be: 1) Global Climate Models; and 2) the Paleoclimate Record. He spends little time discussing Climate Models, characterizing them as having some useful applications, but as not accurate enough to be effective at estimating climate sensitivity to forcing agents. His preferred method, the one that he spends much of the book describing, is the Paleoclimate Record. Ice core samples allow researchers to estimate temperature and atmospheric composition going back over 400,000 years, while ocean floor core sample allow researchers to look back even farther, tens of millions of years into the past. How these core samples reveal Earth’s climate history, and what that history tells us about the potential impact of the changes we are making to Earth’s atmosphere are a fascinating story that Hansen manages to present at a level that an interested layman with a little background in science can understand. (For those less interested in the scientific details he at times conveniently suggests points where a reader can skip ahead a few paragraphs or pages).

As he lays out the findings from the past couple of decades of analysis of the Paleoclimate Record, he ranges over a variety of topics, some interesting, some scary: our understanding of why the ice ages occurred and why another one can never occur again as long as mankind survives; how scientists estimate the potential effects of man-made climate forcing agents of the present day based on the effects due to the same forcing agents occurring naturally in the past; and the threat of the melting of frozen methane in a (geologically) short time and its potential to make the Earth uninhabitable. These topics and more Hansen discusses at length and with a level of scientific detail that provides the reader a decent level of understanding of the science as it stands today. One finishes with an appreciation for what is known more precisely, and where there is still uncertainty in the science.

Not just focusing on the problems, Hansen also suggests solutions that can reduce the risk of reaching a dangerous tipping point that could lead to the ‘climate catastrophe’ to which he believes our current course is leading us.

He repeatedly writes that the world must move to zero coal burning emissions by 2030, decreasing linearly from 2010 --- a goal that as of the current year 2011 we are already falling behind --- and that we must not exploit all of the potential gas and oil reserves. To encourage the transition from coal, oil and gas as sources of energy, he suggests the need to make them more expensive, both as motivation to improved levels of efficiency in energy use, and to make other sources of energy friendlier to investment. He spends several pages describing the ineffectiveness of cap-and-trade as an approach to do that, and states his preference for what he describes as a much simpler approach, a fee-and-dividend system. In a fee-and-dividend system, coal, oil and gas are taxed at their point of entry into this country (whether from underground or by transport), and the collected funds are then divided equally in checks to all the country’s legal residents.

Hansen also makes a strong case for nuclear power, while acknowledging the current antipathy of many in the environmental movements to this form of energy. He is convinced that without nuclear power, there will be no possibility of reducing our use of coal to zero. He makes a pitch for what he calls fourth generation, fast breeder reactors, a technology that he states has been proven in the laboratory, is safer to operate and produces waste with much shorter lifetimes than current reactors (a couple hundred years instead of 10,000 years). He defends nuclear energy as an approach to allow us the time to make the long transition to ‘green’ energy sources, by countering that the alternative --- continuing to burn coal --- will lead to certain climate catastrophe. He also makes the interesting point that it is estimated that many more people die each year from pollution due to coal burning, than die from radiation due to nuclear power plants and their waste.

Some of the details of the science aside, the book is a comfortable read. Hansen takes a conversational approach, sounding throughout like the grandfather scientist he is, apologizing to the reader when he fears they might find him too harsh in his condemnation of a particular person, and at times wearing his exasperation with politicians and others on his sleeve. A small quibble with the book is that Hansen mixes the discussion of his political experiences right in with the scientific picture he builds. This does spice up the story a bit, keeping it from becoming a dry, extended scientific research paper, but it can be a little frustrating at times, to have the building of a scientific explanation suddenly put on hold for several pages as he describes yet another example of his interactions with politicians who at best can’t, and at worst won’t, understand what the scientific consensus tells them. Overall, however, Storms of my Grandchildren represents a fascinating introduction to the current state of climate change science --- if also a scary, wake-up call as politicians discuss the exploitation of tar sands, and countries world-wide continue to build more coal-fired power plants.


Other reviews / information:

Hansen maintains a website with updated figures from the book.

Up one level at the same website leads to links to other data on climate science.


Other of my book reviews: FICTION and NON-FICTION

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Comment on Kumi Naidoo editorial in The Nation 'The Safe Bet: Renewables'

I mostly appreciate and agree with the points Kumi Naidoo makes in his editorial 'The Safe Bet: Renewables' [July 27].  Certainly it is important to continue to support the further development and implementation of renewable sources of energy.

However, he undermines his argument by not acknowledging several fundamental scientific barriers that must be understood and addressed.

One is in regard to his statement from a UN report that '[renewable energy] dominates nuclear power globally by a ratio of six to one'.  It is true that the report indicates that renewable energy is a larger source of energy than nuclear energy, 12.9% to 2%.  But Mr. Naidoo leaves out two important points: 1) 10.2% of the renewable energy is listed as 'biomass', which still generates greenhouse gases; and 2) 2.3% is hydropower which leaves 0.4% of energy coming from wind, solar and geothermal.  So, true sources of renewable energy that do not create greenhouse gases (unlike biofuel) and are broadly expandable (unlike hydropower) still trail nuclear energy by an order of magnitude.  There is much development still needed before they become significant factors.

Another important point that Mr. Naidoo ignores in his article is that oil, gas and coal provide something that wind and solar in particular cannot provide: a stable energy supply available day and night.  Aside from the obvious problem that the wind is not always blowing nor the sun always shining, battery technology is not currently developed to a point were the necessary amounts of energy can be stored for use during these 'down' times.  He should clearly acknowledge this as a fundamental area of technology development that is needed to make wind and solar power more broadly feasible energy sources.

Finally, he trumpets the current shift in Japan and Germany away from nuclear power.  But, despite the significant gains that Germany has made in implementing solar panels and solar water heaters (in a trip there earlier this year it was surprising how wide-spread these were in the area I visited), both Japan and Germany are expected to need to turn to increased use of coal, oil and gas to replace the energy that is being given up by nuclear power.  (Germany actually may also need to turn to nuclear energy from France.)  The reality is that there is an immediate need for an energy source that will produce 24 hours a day and that will allow us over the next couple of decades (i.e., very quickly) to reduce to near zero the generation of greenhouse gases.  Renewable energy sources today satisfy neither of these criteria.  It is hard to see at this point a source of energy other than nuclear power that will allow us the time to make the transition to clean energy while avoiding the approaching climate disaster.

To be clear, I largely agree with Mr. Naidoo's goals.  I would like to see subsidies for coal, oil and gas companies ended, a carbon tax implemented, investment in renewable energy increased and the phase-out of particularly coal as a source of energy.  But it does a disservice to these causes to ignore the reality of the scientific challenges facing us in working toward these goals. 

Better to be upfront about the challenges, and point out feasible path to a solution: end subsidies for coal, oil and gas companies and use these subsidies to invest in the further development of renewable energy technologies.  Implement a carbon tax (the income from which is directly turned over to people) to drive efficiency improvements through the market.  And, though possibly unpalatable, but critical, invest in the nuclear power plants required to allow us to end our need to burn coal before we pass a dangerous tipping point in our climate.